Skip to main content

Research

Research at Mango Languages

Discover the science behind Mango Languages.

Efficacy study

Our methodology, put to the test

Researchers at Queens College, City University of New York, and the University of South Carolina conducted an independent study to assess the efficacy of Mango's learning system.

Who took part: 95 adults in the United States, aged 21 to 66, all self-reported novice learners of Spanish, who studied with Mango exclusively for two months.

Written proficiency was measured with the WebCAPE college placement test; oral proficiency with the TrueNorth Test, which produces estimated ACTFL and CEFR levels.

Download the full report (PDF)

A one-page summary of the 2019 Mango Languages efficacy study

Whole sample

What every participant gained

Across all 95 participants.

improved their written proficiency

82%

measured with the WebCAPE college placement test

increased their oral proficiency

77%

measured with the TrueNorth Test

of study, on average, over two months

15 hours

to cover the requirements of a first college semester of Spanish (95% confidence interval: 12–20 hours)

Oral proficiency

Among learners who put in eight hours or more

Among the 46 participants who studied for eight hours or more:

increased their TrueNorth oral proficiency score

85%

raised their estimated ACTFL level by at least one level

74%

by up to four levels (95% confidence interval: 59.6–84.4%)

raised their estimated CEFR level

72%

The study covered adult learners of Spanish, so it doesn't tell you what to expect in another language or with younger learners.

Learner sentiment

What participants said about it

Self-reported at the end of the study, alongside the proficiency testing.

found it easy to use

95%

found it enjoyable

91%

found it helpful

88%

Net Promoter Score

+42

Publications

The research library

The publications below include in-house white papers detailing the research that informs our products, along with research studies demonstrating product efficacy and user behaviors conducted by independent researchers or in collaboration with our research team.

  • A one-page summary of the 2019 Mango Languages efficacy study
    Independent study

    2019

    Mango Languages Efficacy Study: Final Report

    Roumen Vesselinov, PhD & John Grego, PhD · Independent study: Queens College, City University of New York, and the University of South Carolina

    Ninety-five US adults, all self-reported novice learners of Spanish, studied with Mango exclusively for two months. Written proficiency was measured with the WebCAPE college placement test and oral proficiency with the TrueNorth Test.

    Note: Spanish only, adult learners only. Several headline figures apply to the subgroup who studied eight hours or more, not to the whole sample.

  • The cover of the Mango Languages second language acquisition whitepaper, Classroom Edition
    Written by Mango

    Mango Languages and Our Approach to Second Language Acquisition

    Anja Green, Linguist Manager, Mango Languages · Whitepaper

    How Mango's methodology draws on second language acquisition research: Krashen's Affective Filter and Input hypotheses, Communicative Language Teaching, and the five skills of speaking, listening, reading, writing and culture.

  • The cover of The Mango Curriculum whitepaper, beside a page showing how chapters map to language semesters
    Written by Mango

    The Mango Curriculum: An All-in-One Solution for K-12 Language Classrooms

    George Smith & Kaitlyn Tagarelli · Whitepaper

    The design of Mango's K-12 curriculum and how it maps to state and national world language standards, including ACTFL's World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages.

  • The cover of the survival-analysis paper published in Studies in Second Language Acquisition
    Peer-reviewed · Mango co-author

    2024

    Acceptance and engagement patterns of mobile-assisted language learning among non-conventional adult L2 learners: A survival analysis

    Hyun-Bin Hwang, Matthew D. Coss, Shawn Loewen & Kaitlyn M. Tagarelli · Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46, 969–995

    A survey of 3,670 adult app-based language learners, paired with their actual usage histories, asking why attrition is so high in mobile-assisted language learning and what distinguishes learners who keep going.

    Note: Co-authored by a member of the Mango Languages team.

  • The cover of Mango's plain-language summary of the TESOL Quarterly study
    Peer-reviewed · Mango co-author

    2025

    Acceptance and use of app-based language learning among young adolescents in a self-directed context

    Hyun-Bin Hwang · TESOL Quarterly

    297 South Korean middle-school students aged 12 to 13 were given voluntary access to Mango's English course outside class. Completion ranged from zero to 92 lessons. Students who saw the app as useful, and who felt supported by their teachers in using it, did substantially more.

    Note: The author is a past recipient of Mango's dissertation award.

Methodology

What Mango is built on

Mango's methodology, Intuitive Language Construction™, comes out of second language acquisition research rather than from a content plan. Two of Krashen's ideas do most of the load-bearing work: the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which is why lessons are built to be low-stakes enough that a learner will risk speaking, and the Input Hypothesis, which is why material sits a step beyond where the learner currently is instead of well beyond it.

The lessons themselves follow Communicative Language Teaching, every chapter opens with a real conversation in the target language and works outward from it. And we teach five skills rather than the traditional four: speaking, listening, reading, writing, and culture, because cultural literacy is part of understanding what someone means.

Our course and classroom guides are organized around ACTFL's Five Cs: Communication, Cultures, Connections, Comparisons and Communities, and the World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages. You can read the full account in our whitepaper on second language acquisition.

"The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) guidelines" and "Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Levels" are the property and/or marks of their respective owners and have no official association with Mango Languages or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. Neither ACTFL nor CEFR have in any way endorsed, sponsored, or otherwise agreed to partner or be associated with Mango Languages, or the Mango Languages Proficiency Scale, and no such partnership or association is intended or implied.

Research Initiatives

Collaboration & Findings

Dissertation Awards

Each year, Mango recognizes exceptional dissertation research at the intersection of language learning and educational technology.

See the awards

Research collaboration

Our Research team works closely with academic partners to answer important questions about language learning technology.

Work with us

Proficiency levels

How the Mango Proficiency Scale maps to the ACTFL and CEFR frameworks, level by level.

See the scale

See it in practice

Schools, libraries, and companies on what changed after they rolled Mango out.